top of page

Our findings & insights


Evaluating Networks as Systems
This post recommends an academic article by Dr. Yuval Ofek that presents a configurational model for network evaluation. The article links network complexity and system dynamics with appropriate evaluation approaches, explaining when to use actor- or program-oriented methods and how to structure coordination and governance in evaluation. By framing evaluation as “a network within a network,” the model offers insights for both network evaluators and researchers studying networ
May 1, 20251 min read


How Do You Evaluate Innovation Communities? Key Lessons from a Global Review
Innovation and knowledge communities are increasingly used to tackle complex social, economic, and environmental challenges. From organizational innovation platforms to large international ecosystems, these communities bring together diverse actors to learn, collaborate, and co-create solutions. Yet assessing their value and impact remains methodologically challenging. In 2024, Key Impact conducted a global literature review, funded by the Hive - the Hub for Social Initiative
Apr 1, 20252 min read


Network evaluation in Action: Insights from the Public Sector Infrastructure Developers Program
This post reflects on the evaluation of the Public Sector Network of Infrastructure Developers, a program designed to strengthen knowledge, coordination, and collaboration across public infrastructure actors. Using a theory-based, longitudinal, and network evaluation approach, the evaluation examined individual learning outcomes alongside the development of professional relationships over time.
Mar 1, 20253 min read


Evaluating Amid Uncertainty: Lessons from IsraAID’s Ukraine Emergency Response
This post reflects on the evaluation of IsraAID’s Ukraine Emergency Response, implemented under rapidly evolving and volatile conditions. Combining a Theory of Change with a developmental evaluation approach, the evaluation adapted indicators of success as needs, access, and priorities shifted during the war. Findings highlight the program’s relevance, its contribution to strengthening professional capacities, services, partnerships, and community resilience.
Feb 1, 20253 min read


Reflecting on Amplify, Verify, Engage: Lessons from Evaluating Democratic Media Support in South Caucasus and Central Asia
Between 2021 and 2023, the project Amplify, Verify, Engage: Information for Democratization and Good Governance in Eurasia (AVE) sought to strengthen independent media, civil society, and cross-border cooperation in contexts marked by shrinking civic space, political repression, and violent conflict. Implemented by the Institute for War & Peace Reporting (IWPR) and funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, AVE operated across Central Asia, the South Caucasus, Bela
Jan 1, 20253 min read


Fostering Dialogue in a Divided Education System: What We Learned from Evaluating the DIP Program
Pupils engaging in a shared creative activity that fostered interaction, mutual learning, and trust across communities. In societies marked by deep social, cultural, and religious divisions, education plays a critical role in shaping attitudes, relationships, and future coexistence. The Dialogue and Identity Program (DIP), implemented by the Rossing Center for Education and Dialogue and the TALI Education Fund in Israel, was one such initiative. Running since 2006 and endorse
Dec 1, 20242 min read


From Participation to Leadership: What the Evaluation of the JDC-FSU Young Leadership Program Taught Us
For nearly two decades, the JDC-FSU Young Leadership Program (YLP) played a central role in strengthening Jewish community life across Former Soviet Union (FSU) countries. Launched in 2002 by the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC), YLP aimed to cultivate a new generation of committed, capable local Jewish leaders who could actively contribute to their communities. Between September 2019 and July 2020, Key Impact, in collaboration with Info Sapiens Ukraine, con
Oct 1, 20243 min read


Evaluating Social Exclusion and University-Community Partnerships
This post recommends an academic paper by Dr. Yuval Ofek that addresses the challenges of evaluating community-level social exclusion interventions, particularly within university-community partnerships. Drawing on an action research case study in northern Israel, the paper explores how evaluation can balance learning and improvement with accountability demands in complex settings.
Sep 1, 20241 min read


Following Social Innovation Over Time: Evaluating The Hive’s Accelerator
This post reflects on the evaluation of The Hive’s Accelerator, Israel’s flagship program for social entrepreneurship. Using a theory-based, developmental, and longitudinal evaluation design, the evaluation followed ventures over time to assess learning, sustainability, and scaling. Findings show strong contributions to entrepreneurs’ capacities and strategy, and demonstrate how adaptive, learning-oriented evaluation supported continuous program improvement.
Aug 1, 20242 min read


Choosing the Right Evaluation Approach for Complex Programs
This post recommends an academic article by Dr. Yuval Ofek that reframes how evaluation approaches should be chosen for complex interventions. Drawing on case studies and empirical research, the article shows how misaligned evaluation methods can undermine learning and accountability. It introduces a practical tool for matching evaluation approaches to levels of nonlinearity and complexity, offering clear guidance for evaluators, managers, and funders working in complex progr
Jun 1, 20242 min read
bottom of page
